Research standards

How CueDeed turns public records into reviewable property signals

CueDeed is designed to reduce the time spent sorting public property records without hiding uncertainty. The process preserves the official evidence first, adds separate enrichment layers, and explains what still needs verification.

Core research rules

1. Preserve the source before ranking

CueDeed keeps the raw official record, its publication or delivery date, and the locality-specific meaning of each field. A later enrichment result does not overwrite the source evidence.

2. Separate signals by legal meaning

Tax delinquency, a tax-sale certificate, a judicial-sale notice, an assessment, a vacant-building notice, and an ownership record answer different questions. Combining them into one undifferentiated distress label would overstate what the evidence proves.

3. Recheck freshness before delivery

Where an official live path exists, higher-priority records can be checked for payment or redemption, ownership change, amount change, and completed or cancelled sale evidence. Where no decisive public path exists, that limitation remains visible.

4. Explain the next verification step

A useful research record should state why it deserves review and what must still be confirmed. CueDeed does not publish its detailed ranking formula, but it does identify the evidence class, source date, confidence, and unresolved checks needed before outreach or transaction use.

Methodology limits

CueDeed research is not title work, a legal opinion, an appraisal, proof of vacancy, or proof that an owner is motivated to sell. Public sources change, and current transaction decisions require direct verification with the responsible authority and appropriate professionals.

Continue exploring

Sources and evidence

Evidence summary updated 2026-09-14.

Want CueDeed signals matched to your buy box?

Order five researched property candidates for $249, with documented context behind each qualified signal.

Get five matched signals